[llvm-dev] Get full cmake lines and prepocessed source for a GCC bug report
Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 29 01:18:07 PDT 2018
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for filing a GCC v8.2.0 bug in Debian/buster AMD64 the Debian/GCC
>> mainatiners want two things...
>>
>> [ FULL CMAKE LINE ]
>>
>> How do I configure this in the LLVM/Clang build?
>> Can I set an option of cmake?
>>
>> [ PREPROCESSED SOURCE FILES ]
>>
>> How and where do I get the preprocessed source?
>> Do I need to set options for this in my build-script?
>
> From your other email, when the compiler crashed, ninja printed the invocation:
>
> /usr/bin/g++-8 -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0 -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
> -Ilib/Bitcode/Reader
> -I/home/sdi/src/llvm-toolchain/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader -Iinclude
> -I/home/sdi/src/llvm-toolchain/llvm/include -fPIC
> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Werror=date-time -std=c++11 -Wall -Wextra
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
> -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long
> -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-class-memaccess
> -Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-comment -fdiagnostics-color
> -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O3 -UNDEBUG -fno-exceptions
> -fno-rtti -MD -MT
> lib/Bitcode/Reader/CMakeFiles/LLVMBitReader.dir/MetadataLoader.cpp.o
> -MF lib/Bitcode/Reader/CMakeFiles/LLVMBitReader.dir/MetadataLoader.cpp.o.d
> -o lib/Bitcode/Reader/CMakeFiles/LLVMBitReader.dir/MetadataLoader.cpp.o
> -c /home/sdi/src/llvm-toolchain/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/MetadataLoader.cpp
>
>
> To generate preprocessed source from that, you use the -E flag, so
> adding something like this to the end of command-line should work:
>
> -E -o /tmp/preprocessed.ii
>
>
> To see the internal GCC invocation, you can add the -### option to the
> command. The output of that, and the preprocessed source, should be
> enough to reproduce the bug.
>
Thanks, Hans.
I kept the build-directory of my build with my selfmade llvm-toolchain
v7.0.0rc2.
So I can run this gcc-line directly?
- sed@ -
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list