[llvm-dev] Lowering ISD::TRUNCATE
Craig Topper via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 6 12:10:58 PDT 2018
The X86 i16->i8 case is handled with these two patterns in
X86InstrCompiler.td. One for 32-bit mode where we have to be careful to
ensure we are starting from AX/BX/CX/DX. 64-bit uses a separate simpler
pattern since SP/BP/SI/DI gain SPL/BPL/SIL/DIL in 64-bit mode.
def : Pat<(i8 (trunc GR16:$src)),
(EXTRACT_SUBREG (i16 (COPY_TO_REGCLASS GR16:$src, GR16_ABCD)),
sub_8bit)>,
Requires<[Not64BitMode]>;
def : Pat<(i8 (trunc GR16:$src)),
(EXTRACT_SUBREG GR16:$src, sub_8bit)>,
Requires<[In64BitMode]>;
~Craig
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:07 PM Michael Stellmann via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I'm working on defining the instructions and implementing the lowering
> code for a Z80 backend. For now, the backend supports only the native
> CPU-supported datatypes, which are 8 and 16 bits wide (i.e. no 32 bit
> long, float, ... yet).
>
> So far, a lot of the simple stuff like immediate loads and return values
> is very straightforward, but now I got stuck with ISD::TRUNCATE, as in:
>
> typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
> uint8_t Func(uint8_t val1) { return val1 + val1; }
>
> built with -O0 results in:
>
> target datalayout = "e-m:o-S8-p:16:8-p1:8:8-i16:8-i32:8-a:8-n8:16"
> target triple = "z80"
> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind optnone
> define dso_local zeroext i8 @Func(i8 zeroext %val1) #0 {
> entry:
> %val1.addr = alloca i8, align 1
> store i8 %val1, i8* %val1.addr, align 1
> %0 = load i8, i8* %val1.addr, align 1
> %conv = zext i8 %0 to i16
> %1 = load i8, i8* %val1.addr, align 1
> %conv1 = zext i8 %1 to i16
> %add = add nsw i16 %conv, %conv1
> %conv2 = trunc i16 %add to i8
> ret i8 %conv2
> }
>
> I looked into the X86 backend, which has a Z80-like register design,
> i.e. being able to access the subregs AL (and AH) from AX directly,
> without any specific truncation operation necessary. But, to be honest,
> I do not really understand from the code where and how the i16 to i8
> case is handled.
>
> So returning an 8 bit result would simply require loading the lower 8
> bits ("AL" on X86) from the resulting value 16 bit (%add) into the 8 bit
> return register, as defined by the calling convention.
> (Or to be Z80 specific: The 16 bit add operation will be "ADD HL,DE",
> calling conv defined register "A" be the i8 return value, so the last
> two IR lines should emit something like "LD A,L / RET".)
>
> That said, what is the correct way to implement ISD::TRUNCATE this in
> the backend, using the CPU's capability that truncating i16 to i8 is
> simply accessing an i16' register's subreg?
>
> Should this be handled in "LowerOperation" or in "PerformDAGCombine"?
> Or could this be done with a target-independent combine?
> Would returning true in "isTruncateFree" suffice?
> Is any lowering code needed at all?
>
> The X86 backend seems to do both, "setTargetDAGCombine(ISD::TRUNCATE)",
> but then also registering a lot of MVTs via
> "setOperationAction(...,Custom)", depending on things like soft-float.
> I guess I'm
>
> And second:
> In my case, with only i16 and i8 data types, And are there other
> truncation operations to be supported? Is there any scenario where i8 to
> i1 is needed? My first guess was for conditional branching, but my tests
> showed that it works with flags, comparing "not equal" or "not zero", so
> I assume not.
>
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180806/d7a76719/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list