[llvm-dev] [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?

[George Rimar via llvm-dev]

Just in case, a little update for this thread:


There was a talk about "Protecting the code: Control Flow Enforcement Technology" during the recent

llvm-dev meeting (https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/talks.html#Talk_17).


It was mentioned that some support is already implemented in LLVM. I did not have chance to look close on

it though. Whole feature requires linker side support, current status: bfd support this, gold - still does not.


I would love to see some comments from O. Simhon? in this thread probably.


Best regards,
George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc
________________________________
От: Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com>
Отправлено: 23 марта 2018 г. 0:58
Кому: George Rimar
Копия: rafael at espindo.la; llvm-dev
Тема: Re: [LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?

I'd think we shouldn't do anything even for printing out a warning unless doing it is proved to be useful.

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:04 AM George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com<mailto:grimar at accesssoftek.com>> wrote:

>I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld.

>
>Cheers,
>Rafael

Ok. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the object??

?Best regards,
George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180430/19888b29/attachment.html>