[llvm-dev] PSA: Potential lit workflow change

[Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev]

Thanks for working on this.

One question: do you know what's the fastest way to create a working <output-tree>/bin/llvm-lit program? By 'working', I mean: assuming I've already built llvm-config and the relevant test dependencies (FileCheck, opt, etc), I can run llvm-lit on a single test.


> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all, I've got https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D37756> up for review currently which simplifies a lot of the logic in our lit config files.
> 
> For most people, this will be completely transparent and "just work", but it breaks one workflow that people should be aware of.
> 
> Problem: If you run lit by putting llvm-config in your path and then running <source-root>/utils/lit/lit.py <source-root>/<path-to-test-file> then this is not going to work anymore.
> 
> Luckily, there's an easy fix:
> 
> Solution: Run <output-tree>/bin/llvm-lit.py <source-root>/<path-to-test-file>

Will llvm-lit.py be added to <output-tree>/bin, or is this supposed to be <output-tree>/bin/llvm-lit?

vedant

> 
> Happy to answer any questions here or on the code review.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170913/0c9a28f5/attachment.html>