[llvm-dev] [lld] Flavour option purpose
Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 26 14:10:26 PDT 2017
The -flavor option exists mostly for historical reasons. I think using
ld.lld or lld-link is preferred way over "lld -flavor gnu" or "lld -flavor
link".
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:06 PM, N via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to lld/docs/Driver.rst, Flavor command line option determines
> the style of lld command-line interface when invoked.
>
> However, it looks like this option also determines the set of supported
> targets we are linking for. For example, lld -flavor gnu
> cannot link mach-o binaries, and could not link PE binaries either (well,
> not until rL312926).
>
> Is this really intended by the design of lld? It looks the flavours are
> merely legacy compatibility shims, but then why is there no
> universal lld driver that is able to link binary for any platform using a
> unified CLI?
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171026/09e75257/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list