[llvm-dev] PSA: debuginfo-tests workflow changing slightly

Zachary Turner via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 13 16:38:33 PST 2017


Yea I also just found it.  Try adding this code in the bottom of
debuginfo-tests/lit.cfg.py

lit.util.usePlatformSdkOnDarwin(config, lit_config)


On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:38 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:

> Ha! Found it. *Somebody* is setting an SDKROOT variable in the
> environment. Can you find the code that would do this?
>
> — adrian
>
> > On Nov 13, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yes I can reproduce this locally. It looks like we are not passing an
> -isysroot (pointing to the SDK) to clang but it isn’t clear what lit magic
> would expand this.
> >
> > -- adrian
> >
> >> On Nov 13, 2017, at 3:30 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Yea I'm preparing a revert right now.  Does it happen for you when you
> run debuginfo-tests locally?
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:28 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >> Since this is causing all of our internal CI to back up, could you
> please revert your two changes, so we can make sure that they were actually
> responsible, and can work on a fix for this? Let me know how we can help
> investigate this.
> >>
> >> -- adrian
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The first build where a test fails with similar symptoms has just one
> blamelist entry:
> >>>
> >>> http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA/40391/
> >>>
> >>>     • Update test_debuginfo.pl script to point to new tree location.
> (detail/ViewSVN)
> >>> by zturner
> >>> -- adrian
> >>>
> >>>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 3:21 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On the other hand this file hasn't changed recently, but I have no
> way to test this as it uses the LLDB code path, which only runs on OSX.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:19 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> I might be missing something, but this doesn't look like me?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA/40478/consoleFull#-42777206a1ca8a51-895e-46c6-af87-ce24fa4cd561
> >>>>
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: dbg-arg.c (34886 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: ctor.cpp (34887 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: ctor.cpp (34888 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: aggregate-indirect-arg.cpp (34889 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: aggregate-indirect-arg.cpp (34890 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: dbg-arg.c (34891 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: asan.c (34892 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: asan.c (34893 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: asan-blocks.c (34894 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: asan-blocks.c (34895 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: nested-struct.cpp (34896 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: nested-struct.cpp (34897 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: forward-declare-class.cpp (34898 of 40729)
> >>>> PASS: debuginfo-tests :: forward-declare-class.cpp (34899 of 40729)
> >>>> FAIL: debuginfo-tests :: foreach.m (34900 of 40729)
> >>>>
> >>>> ******************** TEST 'debuginfo-tests :: foreach.m' FAILED
> ********************
> >>>>
> >>>> Script:
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/bin/clang
> --target=x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 -O0 -g
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/tests/foreach.m
> -c -o
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.tmp.o
> >>>>
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/bin/clang
> --target=x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.tmp.o
> -o
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.tmp.out
> -framework Foundation
> >>>>
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/utils/
> >>>> test_debuginfo.pl
> >>>>
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/tests/foreach.m
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.tmp.out
> >>>> --
> >>>> Exit Code: 1
> >>>>
> >>>> Command Output (stdout):
> >>>> --
> >>>> Debugger output was:
> >>>> imported lldb from:
> "/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/SharedFrameworks/LLDB.framework/Versions/A/Resources/Python"
> >>>> error: foreach.m.tmp.out debug map object file
> '/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.tmp.o'
> has changed (actual time is 0x5a0a2528, debug map time is 0x5a0a2526) since
> this executable was linked, file will be ignored
> >>>> >  break 25
> >>>> SBBreakpoint: id = 1, file = '', line = 25, exact_match = 0,
> locations = 0
> >>>> >  r
> >>>> success
> >>>> >  po thing
> >>>>  = <could not resolve type>
> >>>> > quit
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Command Output (stderr):
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>>
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/tests/foreach.m:11:11:
> error: expected string not found in input
> >>>>
> >>>> // CHECK: aaa
> >>>>           ^
> >>>>
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.gdb.output:1:1:
> note: scanning from here
> >>>> imported lldb from:
> "/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/SharedFrameworks/LLDB.framework/Versions/A/Resources/Python"
> >>>> ^
> >>>>
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.gdb.output:2:211:
> note: possible intended match here
> >>>> error: foreach.m.tmp.out debug map object file
> '/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/Output/foreach.m.tmp.o'
> has changed (actual time is 0x5a0a2528, debug map time is 0x5a0a2526) since
> this executable was linked, file will be ignored
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 3:17 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> It looks like the bots are still red?
> >>>>
> >>>> — Adrian
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Nov 10, 2017, at 3:14 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Wasn't quite fixed, but it got a lot further this time.  This time
> there was still an issue in the test_debuginfo.pl script regarding a
> hardcoded path to the llgdb.py script.  I think I never encountered this
> locally because this codepath only happens on Darwin, and I was testing on
> Linux.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (As an aside, ugh... Perl...)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regardless, this should be fixed in r317949, and hopefully that's
> the last of the issues.  I have to run for a couple of hours, but I can
> check on this again in a bit.  But I strongly suspect it will be fixed now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:51 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 10, 2017, at 2:50 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I checked in a fix for that already, sorry for the trouble. I’m
> waiting for it to cycle
> >>>>>
> >>>>> awesome. Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- adrian
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:49 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> It looks like this broke green dragon:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA/40383/console
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> llvm-lit:
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/projects/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/config.py:173:
> note: Adding environment variables: {'DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH':
> '/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/./lib',
> 'LIBCXX_FILESYSTEM_DYNAMIC_TEST_ROOT':
> '/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/projects/libcxx/test/filesystem/Output/dynamic_env'}
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> llvm-lit:
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/utils/lit/lit/llvm/config.py:332:
> note: using clang:
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/clang-build/bin/clang
> >>>>>> llvm-lit:
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/utils/lit/lit/util.py:379:
> note: using SDKROOT:
> '/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.12.sdk'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> llvm-lit:
> /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py:101:
> fatal: unable to parse config file
> '/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/
> lit.cfg.py', traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>>>>>   File
> "/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/utils/lit/lit/TestingConfig.py",
> line 88, in load_from_path
> >>>>>>     exec(compile(data, path, 'exec'), cfg_globals, None)
> >>>>>>   File
> "/Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/clang-stage1-configure-RA/llvm/tools/clang/test/debuginfo-tests/
> lit.cfg.py", line 36, in <module>
> >>>>>>     config.test_source_root =
> os.path.join(config.debuginfo_tests_src_root, 'tests')
> >>>>>> AttributeError: TestingConfig instance has no attribute
> 'debuginfo_tests_src_root'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> FAILED: CMakeFiles/check-all
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- adrian
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > On Nov 10, 2017, at 1:00 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > This is in as of r317925.  I'm keeping an eye out for failure
> notifications.  I may or may not need help diagnosing if something does go
> wrong (although I'm keeping my fingers crossed)
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:05 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> > Since it's towards the end of the day already, I'll put this in
> tomorrow morning around 9 or 10, to make sure I'm around to fix anything
> that arises (or revert).
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:53 PM Mike Edwards <medwards at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> > Hi Zach,
> >>>>>> > Thanks for doing this extra work to make this lower impact for
> the rest of us.  Let’s give it a try and see what happens.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > -Mike
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >> On Nov 9, 2017, at 13:37, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> Hi all, I think I've addressed all the concerns here, and I
> believe there should be no immediate impact to the current workflow.  with
> that said, I plan to commit this either later today or early tomorrow if
> there are no other concerns.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM Zachary Turner <
> zturner at google.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> >> I tested this out, and AFAICT nothing will change.  It will
> continue to just work if you have it checked out under clang/tests.  It's a
> bit hard to construct this configuration locally since it requires moving
> some files around, and applying half of a CL here and half of a CL there.
> But, AFAICT it works.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> I'm happy to send you some patches if you want to try them
> locally and confirm.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> I'd like to print out a CMake warning if it detects the tree
> under clang/test and just mention that the workflow is deprecated.  Any
> objections?
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM Mike Edwards <medwards at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> >> Thank you Zach.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>> On Nov 6, 2017, at 13:37, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> I’m going to spend a little time seeing if i can make the
> change invisible to the bots so they will continue to work as they do
> today.  Will report back after I’ve explored that a bit
> >>>>>> >>> On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 1:35 PM Mike Edwards <medwards at apple.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>>> I'm honestly not opposed to this idea.  It just seems a shame
> to do this for purely logistical reasons if most people agree that the
> "right" place for debuginfo-tests is outside of the clang tree.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> I totally understand what you are saying here and will just add
> that sometimes being part of a larger community means being willing to do
> things, sometimes, not exactly the “right” way, due to logistical reasons.
> I am not opposed to what you would like to do, I’m just furrowing my brow
> at the timeframe in which to do it.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>> That said, I'd still like to hear from ChrisM and MikeE about
> why it will take so long, because on the surface it seems like a low-impact
> move.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> Past experience has taught me, anything I think is going to be
> simple and quick to fix, rarely ever turns out that way.  While there will
> be a significant amount of work to change the way our bots work here at
> Apple, the work is not impossible to accomplish.  Given the choice, I would
> of course prefer an approach such as Paulr has suggested.  The ability to
> run things in parallel for a time provides for a much lower impact change
> on the entire community.  I think this approach may also give us some time
> to decide where the debuginfo-test should fit in the new mono-repo.  It
> would be a bummer to do the work necessary to make this change, only to
> discover we would have to do it differently in the not too distant future
> to accommodate the new mono-repo.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>>  Zach, I do not want to be a blocker here.  I just want to make
> sure we have explored all of the options to make sure we are not missing a
> lower impact approach.  I also want to make sure we are not doing something
> that could wait until we migrate to the mono-repo next year.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> >>> Mike
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> >>>>>> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >>>>>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171114/c458d350/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list