[llvm-dev] Handling case when getCanonicalInductionVariable() returns NULL
Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 20 10:25:35 PDT 2017
On 3/18/2017 10:06 AM, Alex Susu via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hello.
> Is there a way to obtain an llvm::Loop induction variable when
> getCanonicalInductionVariable() returns NULL? This happens, for
> example, when we have induction variables with non-unit step for loops
> like:
> for (row = 0; row < size; row += 2).
> It seems that using parameters for opt like -indvars (I also
> disabled it some time ago in PassManagerBuilder, but I made sure I
> re-enabled it), -mem2reg, -loop-simplify do not help. (I got inspired
> from other mail threads like
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/2xZAuiY9s_o OR
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13831678/using-indvars-optimization-pass-for-finding-canonical-induction-variable-in-llvm
> ).
>
> I'm thinking to create my own method similar to
> Loop::getCanonicalInductionVariable() (from
> http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/LoopInfo_8cpp_source.html#l00112 ).
> But otherwise am I missing something?
In general, the only way to obtain an induction variable for a loop is
to generate it yourself; there is no general guarantee that a loop has
an induction variable, and there is no optimization which produces them
(except for LSR). If you have a SCEV expression, you can use
ScalarEvolutionExpander to get a Value* for a SCEV expression.
What are you trying to do?
-Eli
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list