[llvm-dev] Please dogfood LLD

[George Rimar via llvm-dev]

>Sounds good - I took only a cursory glance at the llvm-dwarfdump of the index, and it looked like (though I may be mistaken) the >dump output included implementation details (like hashes, buckets, etc) so it wasn't easy to compare the dump from a GCC-built >binary with a Clang-built binary to compare them/see what was missing, etc.

>
>Maybe it'd be worth having a mode that dumped the contents canonicalized (sorted, etc) in some way that'd be easy to
compare?

That is interesting idea. I'll try to build something large to see what dumping mode can be usefull to add for doing comparsion tasks.

>(then again, perhaps it's the structure that's the problem - maybe all the data's there, but there's a bug in the hashing that makes >it invalid/unable for GDB to use it correctly)
>
>Happy to try to help you with it.
>
>- Dave

Yep, it probably can be something minor.
Thanks !

George.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170317/7527196b/attachment.html>