[llvm-dev] [RFC] FP Contract = fast?

[Renato Golin via llvm-dev]

On 15 March 2017 at 15:35, Sebastian Pop <s.pop at samsung.com> wrote:
> I would like to see https://reviews.llvm.org/rL282259 re-enabled,
> and the few miscompares left in the aarch64 run of the test-suite
> fixed by adding the FP_CONTRACT pragma in the source code.

Great! Do you have a list of the remaining cases?

cheers,
--renato