[llvm-dev] Please dogfood LLD

[Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev]

Yes that's the right place to file a bug. However, as to LLD/Mach-O, that
isn't being developed actively.

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Is bugs.llvm.org still the best place to report LLD bugs? Is anyone
> watching those bug reports?
>
> For example I reported https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32254
> yesterday but I'm not sure if anyone saw it.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> LLVM 4.0.0 is out, and I can say that LLD/ELF is now ready for production
>> use at least for x86-64 (and probably for AArch64 and MIPS). I believe
>> you've heard a few good news about the linker -- it just works
>> <http://lld.llvm.org/#features> and is very fast
>> <http://lld.llvm.org/#performance>, clean, compact and supported by the
>> active community. I don't think I need to reiterate why having a good
>> linker is important for us as the LLVM community.
>>
>> There's one thing you can help us without writing even a line of code.
>> Please use it!
>>
>> Using LLD to link LLVM/clang/etc is easy. You need to check out the LLD
>> repository just like you probably already did for clang, build it, and then
>> install it. LLD will be installed as ld.lld (and it won't be used by
>> default.) After that, re-run cmake with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=On along with
>> your usual options so that LLD will be used to build LLVM.
>>
>> For the details of the build process, please see
>> http://lld.llvm.org/#build.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rui
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170314/64ffedb7/attachment.html>