[llvm-dev] The undef story

[Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev]

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:53 PM Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

> >
> > Having read all of these threads, I am thoroughly convinced by the
> positions put forward by others.
> >
>
> Chandler,
>                others have decided to let the compiler continue
> mis-compiling the
> function-inlining example, others have decided to not fix the inability to
> hoist
> a loop invariant divide out of a loop. It sounds like you haven’t even
> thought
> about these things let alone be convinced by anything.  Am I missing
> something
> or have you forgotten what we are talking about here ?
>

Please stop with (what I can only interpret as) personal attacks. I haven't
forgotten what we are talking about.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170629/18cd7f5c/attachment.html>