[llvm-dev] the root cause is copy propagation of undef

Peter Lawrence via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 26 07:50:14 PDT 2017


John,
         I can see that you are upset, but this is because you have
taken offense when none was intended, which is a sure-fire way
to spoil any email conversation.

And it also seems you are upset not because I am not listening,
rather because I have been listening and have successfully
counter-argued what people have been saying.

I am challenging you to question your assumptions, sometimes
this is a difficult process, both mentally and emotionally.

I imagine you to be an intelligent person with integrity and I value
your participation in this discussion, please consider rejoining.

Peter Lawrence.




> On Jun 20, 2017, at 10:14 AM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:35:41 -0600
> From: John Regehr via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] the root cause is CP, was: A tagged
> 	architecture, the elephant in the undef / poison room
> Message-ID: <b82c864f-dfe9-79c6-c2f1-66b57acd572d at cs.utah.edu <mailto:b82c864f-dfe9-79c6-c2f1-66b57acd572d at cs.utah.edu>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> Peter, you mischaracterized what I said, you mischaracterized (below) 
> what Nuno said, and you don't appear to be listening to anything people 
> are saying.
> 
> I'll request (yet again) that you tone it down -- we're trying to make 
> progress on some real problems with LLVM's undefined behavior model and 
> you are hurting the conversation, not helping it.
> 
> Regardless, I'm done arguing with you.
> 
> John

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170626/a085a4ba/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list