[llvm-dev] Which assumptions do llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset.* make when the count is 0?
John Regehr via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 21 12:02:55 PDT 2017
> I don't think that was the conclusion of the discussion? I mean the
> result was that a NULL pointer should be explicitly valid if the length
> argument is zero. That's a bit more restrictive.
Yeah there's a design space here. I don't care about the result but am
volunteering to document whatever people want.
More information about the llvm-dev