[llvm-dev] Which assumptions do llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset.* make when the count is 0?
Ralf Jung via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 20 14:35:54 PDT 2017
Hi all,
when I call the llvm.memcpy/memmove/memset.* intrinsics, typically I
have to pass in valid (non-dangling, non-NULL pointers) of the given
alignment. However, to what extent to these rules apply when the count
is 0? Concretely (for any variant of the three aforementioned
intrinsics): Is it UB to call them on a dangling pointer when count is
0? On a pointer of less than the given alignment?
The actual operation will of course not do anything, but I am worried
about some analysis seeing a pointer being used as an argument to one of
these intrinsics, and then assuming the pointer is valid and aligned
without proving that the count is > 0.
E.g., Rust's HashMap indirectly calls memset(0x0, 0, 0, ..., false).
Vec calls memcpy(..., 0x1, 0, 4, false). Is that a problem?
Kind regards,
Ralf
PS: I'm not on the list, so please keep me in Cc.
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list