[llvm-dev] Shipping LLVM.dll for the C API with the Windows installer.
Alexander Benikowski via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 10 06:26:28 PDT 2017
I am sorry, just noticed i repeated myself :(
2017-07-10 15:20 GMT+02:00 Alexander Benikowski <sebal007 at googlemail.com>:
> Thanks for starting!
> Btw here is my CMD version:
>
> cmd /Q /V:ON /c "for /F "tokens=4" %l in ('dir llvm*.lib') do (for /F
> "tokens=2" %e in ('dumpbin /linkermember:1 %l ^| findstr "_LLVM"') do (set
> symbolname=%e & echo !symbolname:~1!))"
>
> You run it in the directory with all the llvm*.lib (yes the ThinLTO is
> excluded in this example but can be added easily i think)
>
> 2017-07-06 20:16 GMT+02:00 Jakob Bornecrantz <wallbraker at gmail.com>:
>
>> Made a bit of headway here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35077
>>
>> Cheers, Jakob.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Alexander Benikowski
>> <sebal007 at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > Maybe someone can use this as a startingpoint to add the
>> windows-specific
>> > commandblock which is triggered instead of the Darwin one together with
>> a
>> > proper setup of targets to have the libs build before.
>> >
>> > 2017-04-06 14:30 GMT+02:00 Alexander Benikowski <
>> sebal007 at googlemail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> The following is an older commandline i used. Have a more recent one at
>> >> home. But basically you can write it as batch and trigger it within a
>> target
>> >> during the build(never got targets into correct order, i am a cmake
>> noob)
>> >>
>> >> So for reference, i'll post this one and look for the recent one at
>> >> home(if that didn't go down with my recent hdd crash):
>> >>
>> >> cmd /Q /V:ON /c "for /F "tokens=4" %l in ('dir llvm*.lib') do (for /F
>> >> "tokens=2" %e in ('dumpbin /linkermember:1 %l ^| findstr "_LLVM"') do
>> (set
>> >> symbolname=%e & echo !symbolname:~1!))"
>> >>
>> >> What it does:
>> >>
>> >> For all *.lib files ina specific dir starting with LLVM call
>> dumpbin.exe
>> >> (tool from Visualstudio) and write all symbols with LLVM_ into a
>> specific
>> >> file
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2017-04-05 20:40 GMT+02:00 Jakob Bornecrantz via llvm-dev
>> >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:20 PM, John Brawn <John.Brawn at arm.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> > We already half-have this, the LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_C_DYLIB cmake option
>> >>> > builds
>> >>> > a shared object which exports the llvm-c interface but it only
>> works on
>> >>> > Darwin.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > tools/llvm-shlib/CMakeLists.txt is where how this is done is
>> defined,
>> >>> > and it
>> >>> > looks like it does it by:
>> >>> > * build LLVM.so
>> >>> > * use nm+awk+sed to pick out the symbols starting with LLVM
>> >>> > * build LLVM-C.so using a -reexport_library linker option
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I'm thinking that maybe we could make this not-darwin-specific by
>> >>> > making
>> >>> > use of utils/extract_symbols.py:
>> >>> > * edit extract_symbols.py to add a --only_unmangled option (or
>> maybe
>> >>> > --only_prefix=LLVM or something like that)
>> >>> > * on non-darwin use that instead of the existing command to get the
>> >>> > symbols to export (or: make extract_symbols.py work on Darwin)
>> >>> > * instead of building LLVM-C.so from LLVM.so using this
>> >>> > -reexport_library
>> >>> > option, instead build LLVM-C.so from the same libraries that
>> LLVM.so
>> >>> > is built from
>> >>> > (where I use .so above, it also applies to .dll)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > John
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the info John!
>> >>>
>> >>> I tried to enable LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_C_DYLIB on my linux machine
>> >>> to play around a little bit. I disabled the APPLE check to get past
>> that.
>> >>> The config failed if I had BUILD_SHARED_LIBS also set to true.
>> >>> If I tried that without the flag it complained about missing:
>> >>> builddir/./lib/libLLVM.so
>> >>>
>> >>> Which is a bit weird since it builds a lib/libLLVM-5.0svn.so.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have to admit I'm a tiny bit in over my head here with the cmake
>> >>> scripts here.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers, Jakob.
>> >>>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> >> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf
>> Of
>> >>> >> Jakob Bornecrantz via llvm-dev
>> >>> >> Sent: 05 April 2017 12:51
>> >>> >> To: llvm-dev
>> >>> >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Shipping LLVM.dll for the C API with the
>> >>> >> Windows
>> >>> >> installer.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz
>> >>> >> <wallbraker at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Hello list!
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > So I'm wondering if there is a will to ship a DLL with the C API
>> >>> >> > exported? LLVM currently ships with LTO.dll which has some C api
>> >>> >> > functions exported, made from the export file
>> tools/lto/lto.exports,
>> >>> >> > so it would not be the first DLL LLVM shipped.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Currently I (and the users of my project[1]) are building it
>> >>> >> > ourselves
>> >>> >> > using this script[2] derived from the LLVMSharp script[3]. Which
>> >>> >> > adds
>> >>> >> > a extra long step for all users of ours and other projects like
>> >>> >> > LLVMSharp in order to use them.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > The resulting LLVM.dll exports 809 functions and weighs in at
>> around
>> >>> >> > 18mb, so it would make the installer larger. There is also the
>> cost
>> >>> >> > of
>> >>> >> > maintaining a lists of export for the DLL, but hopefully we can
>> use
>> >>> >> > the llvm-echo to test it on the windows nodes so any failure to
>> add
>> >>> >> > new exports gets detected early.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Now for the bike-shed questions, do we call it LLVM-c.dll or just
>> >>> >> > LLVM.dll? Annotate all functions with a LLVM_EXPORT define or
>> use a
>> >>> >> > llvm-c.exports file?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Thoughts and feedback welcome.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Cheers, Jakob.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > [1] http://volt-lang.org
>> >>> >> > [2]
>> >>> >> > https://github.com/VoltLang/GenLLVMDLLPy/blob/master/GenLLVM
>> DLL.py
>> >>> >> > [3]
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> https://github.com/Microsoft/LLVMSharp/blob/master/tools/Gen
>> LLVMDLL.ps1
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Ping? Any thoughts?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> What would be the best way to proceed? My cmake-fu is very weak so
>> any
>> >>> >> pointers here from those knowledgeable and stakeholders in the code
>> >>> >> would be greatly appreciated.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Cheers, Jakob.
>> >>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> >>> >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> >>> >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> >>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170710/3c56a921/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list