[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [4.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged

Fri Feb 10 03:38:01 PST 2017

Ed may be able to elaborate on lldb+freebsd state of things.

All I can say is these tests did not exist in 3.9, so I wouldn't call
this a regression. (Well... technically, a similar test existed, but
it was run by a different test runner which I believe is not hooked up
to the command you are running).

cheers,
pavel

On 9 February 2017 at 22:33, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev
<cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 01:33, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> 4.0.0-rc2 was just tagged from the branch at r294535.
>>
>> Building on FreeBSD 10 at least didn't crash this time, and lld built just fine. :)  I uploaded the following:
>>
>> SHA256 (clang+llvm-4.0.0-rc2-i386-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 0725eed8060a1a9983432a547a51c78e155584575120e449c41bebd80eb64652
>> SHA256 (clang+llvm-4.0.0-rc2-amd64-unknown-freebsd10.tar.xz) = 0b71197a3288b4c7c54f12497b4907257eda71d9be0cb26f9497b25539b5a3c3
>>
>> On i386-freebsd10 there were some interesting test results:
>>
>> ********************
>> Unexpected Passing Tests (1):
>>     lldb :: Expr/TestCallStdStringFunction.test
>>
>> ********************
>> Failing Tests (4):
>>     LLVM :: tools/llvm-xray/X86/convert-with-debug-syms.txt
>>     lldb :: Expr/TestCallStopAndContinue.test
>>     lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test
>>     lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test
>>
>> On amd64-freebsd10 the lldb failures didn't occur, but the 'unexpected passing' one did, as did the one xray failure.
>>
>> The xray failure looks like this:
>>
>> FAIL: LLVM :: tools/llvm-xray/X86/convert-with-debug-syms.txt (31351 of 33866)
>> ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: tools/llvm-xray/X86/convert-with-debug-syms.txt' FAILED ********************
>> Script:
>> --
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/./bin/llvm-xray convert -m /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-xray/X86/Inputs/elf64-sample-o2.bin -y /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-xray/X86/Inputs/naive-log-simple.xray -f=yaml -o - 2>&1 | /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0
>> .0-rc2.obj/./bin/FileCheck /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-xray/X86/convert-with-debug-syms.txt
>> --
>> Exit Code: 1
>>
>> Command Output (stderr):
>> --
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/test/tools/llvm-xray/X86/convert-with-debug-syms.txt:13:15: error: expected string not found in input
>> ; CHECK-NEXT: - { type: 0, func-id: 2, function: {{.*foo.*}}, cpu: 37, thread: 84697, kind: function-enter,
>>               ^
>> <stdin>:11:2: note: scanning from here
>>  - { type: 0, func-id: 2, function: 'foo(void)', cpu: 37, thread: 84697,
>>  ^
>> <stdin>:19:2: note: possible intended match here
>>  - { type: 0, func-id: 3, function: main, cpu: 37, thread: 84697, kind: function-exit,
>>  ^
>>
>> --
>>
>> ********************
>>
>> The lldb test failures look like this:
>>
>> FAIL: lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test (32116 of 32394)
>> ******************** TEST 'lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test' FAILED ********************
>> Script:
>> --
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.install/usr/local/bin/clang++ /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Inputs/anonymous-struct.cpp -g -o /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test.tmp && /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/./bin/lldb -b -s /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test -- /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test.tmp | /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/./bin/FileCheck /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test
>> --
>> Exit Code: 1
>>
>> Command Output (stderr):
>> --
>> error: Can't run the expression locally: Interpreter doesn't handle one of the expression's opcodes
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test:11:10: error: expected string not found in input
>> # CHECK: $0 = 1
>>          ^
>> <stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
>> (lldb) target create "/home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test.tmp"
>> ^
>> <stdin>:10:18: note: possible intended match here
>> Breakpoint 1: where = TestCallUserAnonTypedef.test.tmp`main + 55 at anonymous-struct.cpp:25, address = 0x080486b7
>>                  ^
>>
>> --
>>
>> ********************
>>
>> FAIL: lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test (32117 of 32394)
>> ******************** TEST 'lldb :: Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test' FAILED ********************
>> Script:
>> --
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.install/usr/local/bin/clang++ /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Inputs/call-function.cpp -g -o /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test.tmp && /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/./bin/lldb -b -s /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test -- /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test.tmp | /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/./bin/FileCheck /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test
>> --
>> Exit Code: 1
>>
>> Command Output (stderr):
>> --
>> error: Can't run the expression locally: Interpreter doesn't handle one of the expression's opcodes
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test:9:10: error: expected string not found in input
>> # CHECK: $0 = 5
>>          ^
>> <stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
>> (lldb) target create "/home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test.tmp"
>> ^
>> <stdin>:9:18: note: possible intended match here
>> Breakpoint 1: where = TestCallUserDefinedFunction.test.tmp`main + 591 at call-function.cpp:52, address = 0x0804906f
>>                  ^
>>
>> --
>>
>> ********************
>>
>> FAIL: lldb :: Expr/TestCallStopAndContinue.test (32119 of 32394)
>> ******************** TEST 'lldb :: Expr/TestCallStopAndContinue.test' FAILED ********************
>> Script:
>> --
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase2/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.install/usr/local/bin/clang++ /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Inputs/call-function.cpp -g -o /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallStopAndContinue.test.tmp && /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/./bin/lldb -b -s /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallStopAndContinue.test -o continue -o "thread list" -- /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallStopAndContinue.test.tmp 2>&1 | /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/./bin/FileCheck /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallStopAndContinue.test
>> --
>> Exit Code: 1
>>
>> Command Output (stderr):
>> --
>> /home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/llvm.src/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/TestCallStopAndContinue.test:10:10: error: expected string not found in input
>> # CHECK: Execution was interrupted, reason: breakpoint
>>          ^
>> <stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
>> (lldb) target create "/home/dim/llvm-4.0.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-4.0.0-rc2.obj/tools/lldb/lit/Expr/Output/TestCallStopAndContinue.test.tmp"
>> ^
>> <stdin>:15:4: note: possible intended match here
>> * thread #1, stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
>>    ^
>>
>> --
>>
>> ********************
>>
>> I don't have enough lldb clue to figure out what's wrong with it, though.
>
> What's the status of lldb on FreeBSD, i.e. is it used? Did the tests
> pass for 3.9?
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev