[llvm-dev] Upstreaming utils/kate/llvm.xml

[Gleb Popov via llvm-dev]

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com>
wrote:

> I would guess because LLVM IR highlighting would be of interest only to
> LLVM developers, who would all have LLVM checked out anyway.  Also the
> textual syntax isn't guaranteed stable long-term, and it would be an
> additional maintenance burden on LLVM developers to make KDE patches.  I'm
> suspicious that even the version in the LLVM tree is not current, as it
> hasn't been updated in several years.
>
> --paulr
>
>
>
> *From:* llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] *On Behalf Of *Gleb
> Popov via llvm-dev
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 26, 2017 10:57 AM
> *To:* LLVM Dev
> *Subject:* [llvm-dev] Upstreaming utils/kate/llvm.xml
>
>
>
> Hello. I'm KDE developer and while poking around LLVM, I've stumbled upon
> LLVM IR syntax definition for Kate. Is there any reason why hasn't this
> been upstreamed ( https://phabricator.kde.org/source/syntax-highlighting/
> repository/master/ )?
>

Ok, is there any licensing issues that may prevent it be commited to Kate
repository? If not, I'd do that myself.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171230/2ed78eff/attachment.html>