[llvm-dev] Upstreaming utils/kate/llvm.xml

[Matt Arsenault via llvm-dev]

> On Dec 28, 2017, at 13:04, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> I would guess because LLVM IR highlighting would be of interest only to LLVM developers, who would all have LLVM checked out anyway.  Also the textual syntax isn't guaranteed stable long-term, and it would be an additional maintenance burden on LLVM developers to make KDE patches.  I'm suspicious that even the version in the LLVM tree is not current, as it hasn't been updated in several years.
> --paulr
>   <>We already have emacs and vim syntax highlighting in tree which people occasionally update. I don’t see why we wouldn’t include other editors there. The text format doesn’t change so radically that the syntax highlighting changes in any meaningful way.

-Matt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171228/22e5937e/attachment.html>