[llvm-dev] [LLD] Slow callstacks in gdb
Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 5 18:47:43 PST 2017
Somewhat orthogonal to the original issue, but if object files are aligned
only to two bytes in a static archive, and if we are using the four byte
aligned load instruction on armv6 to load data from object files, that
means current LLVM can easily cause a bus error on armv6, no?
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <
> > rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Martin Richtarsky <s at martinien.de> writes:
> >>
> >> > Output looks as follows [1] Seems sh_offset is missing?
> >>
> >> That is what readelf prints as Off
> >>
> >> > [17] .rela.text RELA 0000000000000000 071423
> 001728
> >> 18
> >> > 1 4 8
> >>
> >> The offset of rela text should have been aligned, but it is not. Can you
> >> report a bug on icc? As a work around using the gnu assembler if
> >> possible should fix this.
> >
> >
> > Yeah this is a violation of the spec and must be a bug in ICC. That being
> > said, is there a practical benefit of checking the validity of the
> > alignment, except finding buggy object files early? I mean, if an object
> > file is in an static archive, all "aligned" data in the object file might
> > not be aligned against the beginning of the archive file.
>
> It will at least be aligned to two bytes.
>
> With most current host architectures handling
> packed_endian_specific_integral is fairly efficient. For example, on
> x86_64 reading 32 bits with 1 2 and 4 byte alignment produces in all
> cases:
>
> movl (%rdi), %eax
>
> But on armv6 the aligned case is
>
> ldr r0, [r0]
>
> the 2 byte aligned case is
>
> ldrh r1, [r0, #2]
> ldrh r0, [r0]
> orr r0, r0, r1, lsl #16
>
> and the unaligned case is
>
> ldrb r1, [r0]
> ldrb r2, [r0, #1]
> ldrb r3, [r0, #2]
> ldrb r0, [r0, #3]
> orr r1, r1, r2, lsl #8
> orr r0, r3, r0, lsl #8
> orr r0, r1, r0, lsl #16
>
> On armv7 it is a single ldr on all cases.
>
> Now, I don't really know how much we support *host* architectures
> without a unaligned load instruction. If we don't care about making lld
> and other llvm tools slower on those host architectures we could use
> packed_endian_specific_integral with an alignment of 1 and remove the
> check. I guess we have to ask on llvmdev before changing that.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171205/505c6743/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list