[llvm-dev] [5.0.0 Release] Only 3 release blockers left, please help fix!

[Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Hans
> Wennborg via llvm-dev
> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2017 6:06 PM
> To: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; LLDB Dev; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org)
> Subject: [llvm-dev] [5.0.0 Release] Only 3 release blockers left, please
> help fix!
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> We started the week with 32 open release blockers and are now down to only
> 3:
> https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?f1=blocked&o1=equals&v1=33849&query_form
> at=advanced&resolution=---
> Many thanks for your hard work so far.
> 
> None of the three remaining ones have any traction, so any help would
> be much appreciated:
> 
> https://llvm.org/pr33668
> "Excessive memory and CPU use in tail duplication and associated
> passes due to critical edge splitting"
> Sounds like someone familiar with taildup is needed.
> 
> https://llvm.org/pr33930
> "Assertion `OpN.isUniqued() && "Only uniqued operands cannot be mapped
> immediately"' failed."
> Needs someone familiar with debug info.

See https://reviews.llvm.org/D37038 and comments from Adrian Prantl.
I hope to have time to look at this today, but can't guarantee results.
--paulr

> 
> https://llvm.org/pr33507
> "Assertion failed: Shift >= 0, file
> C:\src\llvm_package_303050\llvm\tools\clang\lib\Format\WhitespaceManager.c
> pp,
> line 245"
> clang-format asserts and breaks the correctness of some code. This
> seems bad. Needs someone familiar with clang-format.
> 
> If we can get these squashed, I'll be a very happy release manger.
> 
> Thanks,
> Hans
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev