[llvm-dev] Getting rid of "%T" expansions

[Justin Bogner via llvm-dev]

Kuba Mracek <mracek at apple.com> writes:
> In <https://reviews.llvm.org/D35396>, several folks agreed that %T is a
> generally bad idea and should be removed, because it causes randomly flaky
> tests due to name collisions.  This is a heads-up that I have patches to
> remove uses of %T throughout LLVM, Clang and compiler-rt ready to commit.
> Unless someone objects, I'll land them in a few days.

+1. %T is confusing and dangerous, and we don't really need it anyway.