[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] FE_INEXACT being set for an exact conversion from float to unsigned long long
Flamedoge via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 19 10:14:20 PDT 2017
> Are we better off using branches instead of cmove to implement FP to
unsigned i64?
This seems like it was done for perf reason (mispredict).
Conditional-to-cmov transformation should keep from introducing additional
observable side-effects, and it's clear that whatever did this did not
account for floating point exception.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Michael Clark via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Changing the list from cfe-dev to llvm-dev
>
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 4:52 AM, Michael Clark <michaeljclark at mac.com> wrote:
>
> I’m getting close. I think it may be an issue with an individual
> intrinsic. I’m looking for the X86 lowering of Instruction::FPToUI.
>
> I found a comment around the rationale for using a conditional move versus
> a branch. I believe the predicate logic using a conditional move is causing
> INEXACT to be set from the other side of the predicate as the lowered
> x86_64 code executes both conversions whereas GCC uses a branch. That seems
> to be the difference.
>
> I can’t find FPToUI in llvm/lib/Target/X86 so I’m trying to figure out
> what the cast gets renamed to in the target layer so I can find where the
> sequence is emitted.
>
>
> $ more llvm/lib/Target/X86//README-X86-64.txt
> …
> Are we better off using branches instead of cmove to implement FP to
> unsigned i64?
>
> _conv:
> ucomiss LC0(%rip), %xmm0
> cvttss2siq %xmm0, %rdx
> jb L3
> subss LC0(%rip), %xmm0
> movabsq $-9223372036854775808, %rax
> cvttss2siq %xmm0, %rdx
> xorq %rax, %rdx
> L3:
> movq %rdx, %rax
> ret
>
> instead of
>
> _conv:
> movss LCPI1_0(%rip), %xmm1
> cvttss2siq %xmm0, %rcx
> movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
> subss %xmm1, %xmm2
> cvttss2siq %xmm2, %rax
> movabsq $-9223372036854775808, %rdx
> xorq %rdx, %rax
> ucomiss %xmm1, %xmm0
> cmovb %rcx, %rax
> ret
>
>
> On 19 Apr 2017, at 2:10 PM, Michael Clark <michaeljclark at mac.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Apr 2017, at 1:14 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 18 April 2017 at 15:54, Michael Clark via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> The only way towards completing a milestone is via fixing a number of
> small issues along
> the way…
>
>
> I believe there's more to it than that. None of LLVM's optimizations
> are aware of this extra side-channel of information (with possible
> exceptions like avoiding speculating fdiv because of unavoidable
> exceptions).
>
> From what I remember, the real proposal is to replace all
> floating-point IR with intrinsics when FENV_ACCESS is on, which the
> optimizers by default won't have a clue about and will treat
> conservatively (essentially like they're modifying external memory).
>
> So be careful with drawing conclusions from small snippets; you're
> probably not seeing the full range of LLVM's behaviour.
>
>
>
> Yes. I’m sure.
>
> It reproduces with just the cast on its own: https://godbolt.org/g/myUoL2
>
> It appears to be in the LLVM lowering of the fptoui intrinsic so it must
> MC layer optimisations.
>
> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
> define i64 @_Z7fcvt_luf(float %f) #0 {
> %1 = alloca float, align 4
> store float %f, float* %1, align 4
> %2 = load float, float* %1, align 4
> %3 = fptoui float %2 to i64
> ret i64 %3
> }
>
>
> GCC performs a comparison with ucomiss and branches whereas Clang computes
> both forms and predicates the result using a conditional move. One of the
> conversions obviously is setting the INEXACT MXCSR flag.
>
> Clang lowering (inexact set when result is exact):
>
> fcvt_lu(float):
> movss xmm1, dword ptr [rip + .LCPI1_0] # xmm1 =
> mem[0],zero,zero,zero
> movaps xmm2, xmm0
> subss xmm2, xmm1
> cvttss2si rax, xmm2
> movabs rcx, -9223372036854775808
> xor rcx, rax
> cvttss2si rax, xmm0
> ucomiss xmm0, xmm1
> cmovae rax, rcx
> ret
>
>
> GCC lowering (sets flags correctly):
>
> fcvt_lu(float):
> ucomiss xmm0, DWORD PTR .LC0[rip]
> jnb .L4
> cvttss2si rax, xmm0
> ret
> .L4:
> subss xmm0, DWORD PTR .LC0[rip]
> movabs rdx, -9223372036854775808
> cvttss2si rax, xmm0
> xor rax, rdx
> ret
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170419/72c5480c/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list