[llvm-dev] compiler-rt, v4.0: arm\udivsi3.S broken for division by zero
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 5 04:44:15 PDT 2017
On 5 April 2017 at 12:40, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> IMO it shouldn't. But it is kind of difficult to provide a good
> implementation in general as it will depend on system-specific
> interfaces, i.e. to raise the signal.
I think that was the reasoning behind the decision to return. Let
systems that care about it dictate their own behaviour and default to
the softest reaction possible.
--renato
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list