[llvm-dev] Modules Maintaining or Removing

[Vassil Vassilev via llvm-dev]

On 02/04/17 16:20, Timo Janssen via llvm-dev wrote:
> I have tried it again. I first build a clang 4.0 final from sources 
> and then tried to build it with LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES=ON and still errors.
There was a typo in the initial command from the attachment but I assume 
you fixed that. It seems you are building with libstdc++. Older versions 
of libstdc++ don't work well with modules. Could you tell us which 
version you are using (echo "" | clang -fsyntax-only -x c++ - -v). 
Anything later than 6 should work, alternatively you could build llvm 
against libc++.

-- Vassil
>
>
> I put a file as an attachment to this e-mail with the terminal output.
>
>
> Am 30.03.2017 um 11:42 schrieb Vassil Vassilev:
>> Hi Timo,
>> On 25/03/17 21:53, Timo Janssen via llvm-dev wrote:
>>> Hallo all,
>>>
>>>
>>> I was trying to Build LLVM with the cmake option LLVM_ENABLE_MODULES 
>>> just out of curiosity. I used the RELEASE_400/final tag.
>>>
>>>
>>> It didn't work as I almost expected.
>> Could you be more specific?
>>>
>>>
>>> So I'm wondering if the modulemaps aren't maintained anymore?
>>   There are two bots building llvm with the modulemap-based modules 
>> support: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-1 and 
>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/buildslaves/modules-slave-2
>>
>>   Most of the time they are green.
>>
>> Cheers, Vassil
>>>
>>> If they aren't maintained anymore, why aren't they removed and that 
>>> cmake option also removed?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170404/4d181d34/attachment.html>