[llvm-dev] RFC #2: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
Ed Schouten via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 12 13:09:03 PDT 2016
Hi Chris,
2016-09-12 19:58 GMT+02:00 Chris Lattner <clattner at llvm.org>:
> You could use a fully proprietary compiler like Intel’s ICC and that would also be fine.
Got it. That's good to hear. What got me on the wrong track is the following:
> As an exception, if you use this Software to compile your source code [...]
I interpreted this as if 'this Software' has an active role, namely
that it has to be the compiler itself. If I read your response
correctly, this doesn't need to be the case. Any piece of software can
be used for that purpose. It would have been a lot more clear for me
if it said:
> As an exception, if this Software is compiled and/or linked together with your source code [...]
But I am not a laywer. :-)
--
Ed Schouten <ed at nuxi.nl>
Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
KvK-nr.: 62051717
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list