[llvm-dev] unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4

[Renato Golin via llvm-dev]

On 12 October 2016 at 14:34, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> So I'd first like to understand whether we still want to keep gcc 4.7 as a
> supported version, or move to 4.8 as was suggested. What is the process for
> making that change?
>

Same as usual: propose on the list, and hope that no one has any blocking
issues. Going to 4.9 failed because many people had reservations, but IIRC,
none of those people had reservations against 4.8.



> If we stick with 4.7 we should have a bot otherwise it will likely stop
> working again pretty quickly.
>

Yes, same for Clang. I suggest we also move to Clang 3.4 as the minimum and
install a quick bot with that.

cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161012/1e3c09b2/attachment.html>