[llvm-dev] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
regehr via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 21 22:06:11 PST 2016
Just want to emphasize that on x86-64 and using Valgrind:
LLVM compiled with LLVM gets 360 unexpected test fails
LLVM compiled with GCC gets 22 unexpected test fails
Of course I don't know how many of these are caused by this bitfield
speculation issue.
John
On 11/21/2016 10:48 PM, regehr via llvm-dev wrote:
> Alright, here's what seems to be happening...
>
> The testcase mentioned below builds a MachineOperand that prints like this:
>
> <BB#2>
>
> The bottom word of this MachineOperand now looks like this, with
> (according to Valgrind) the x's corresponding to uninitialized bits:
>
> xxxx xxxx xxxx 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100
>
> At this point isReg() can be called safely since it looks only at the
> lower bits. isDef() cannot be called safely because it looks at bit 25.
> However it is clear that the C++ code (below) never calls isDef() when
> isReg() returns false, as it does here.
>
> So now back to the asm:
>
> 0000000000000000
> <_Z6xfuncxPKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoEPNS_9BitVectorE>:
>
> 0: b8 ff 00 00 01 mov $0x10000ff,%eax
> 5: 23 07 and (%rdi),%eax
> 7: 3d 00 00 00 01 cmp $0x1000000,%eax
> c: 75 05 jne 13
> <_Z6xfuncxPKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoEPNS_9BitVectorE+0x13>
>
> e: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 13
> <_Z6xfuncxPKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoEPNS_9BitVectorE+0x13>
>
> 13: 48 89 d6 mov %rdx,%rsi
> 16: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 1b <.LCPI5_1+0xb>
>
> It grabs the low word of the MO and uses a mask to grab bit 25 and also
> the low 8 bits. Next, it branches on bit 25, which isn't initialized.
> The code is clever but -- I think -- wrong.
>
> GCC does the right thing here, first branching on the low bits and only
> then looking at bit 25.
>
> Sorry if I got anything wrong here!
>
> John
>
>
>
> On 11/21/2016 04:38 PM, regehr via llvm-dev wrote:
>> I spent some time digging into a Valgrind report of uninitialized values
>> in LLVM r287520 built using itself. (One of quite a few such reports
>> that comes up during a "make check".)
>>
>> I could use another set of eyes on the issue if someone has time.
>>
>> This command gives me an error:
>>
>> valgrind -q ./bin/llc <
>> /home/regehr/llvm/test/CodeGen/Hexagon/hwloop-dbg.ll -march=hexagon
>> -mcpu=hexagonv4
>>
>> The error is at this line:
>>
>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp#L142
>>
>>
>>
>> Here I've refactored the code into a minimal (noinline) function that
>> still triggers the problem. xfunc2() and xfunc3() are also noinline.
>> The problem goes away if either isReg() or isDef() is marked noinline.
>>
>> void xfuncx(const MachineOperand &MO,
>> const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI,
>> BitVector &LivePhysRegs) {
>> if (MO.isReg() && // <<<<------ problem reported here
>> MO.isDef()) {
>> xfunc2(MO, TRI, LivePhysRegs);
>> } else {
>> xfunc3(MO, LivePhysRegs);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The asm is below. Maybe I've been staring too long but I don't see the
>> problem Valgrind is talking about.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> .section
>> .text._Z6xfuncxRKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE,"ax", at progbits
>>
>>
>> .globl
>> _Z6xfuncxRKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE
>>
>> .p2align 4, 0x90
>> .type
>> _Z6xfuncxRKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE, at function
>>
>>
>> _Z6xfuncxRKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE:
>>
>> #
>> @_Z6xfuncxRKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE
>>
>>
>> .Lfunc_begin4:
>> .loc 2 126 0 #
>> ../lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp:126:0
>> .cfi_startproc
>> # BB#0: # %entry
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:MO <- %RDI
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:TRI <- %RSI
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:LivePhysRegs <- %RDX
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: isReg:this <- %RDI
>> .loc 2 127 18 prologue_end #
>> ../lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp:127:18
>> movl $16777471, %eax # imm = 0x10000FF
>> andl (%rdi), %eax
>> .Ltmp128:
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: isReg:this <- %RDI
>> cmpl $16777216, %eax # imm = 0x1000000
>> jne .LBB4_2
>> # BB#1: # %if.then
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:LivePhysRegs <- %RDX
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:TRI <- %RSI
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:MO <- %RDI
>> .Ltmp129:
>> .loc 2 129 5 #
>> ../lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp:129:5
>> jmp
>> _Z6xfunc2RKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE at PLT
>>
>> # TAILCALL
>> .Ltmp130:
>> .LBB4_2: # %if.else
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:LivePhysRegs <- %RDX
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:TRI <- %RSI
>> #DEBUG_VALUE: xfuncx:MO <- %RDI
>> .loc 2 131 5 #
>> ../lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp:131:5
>> movq %rdx, %rsi
>> jmp _Z6xfunc3RKN4llvm14MachineOperandERNS_9BitVectorE at PLT #
>> TAILCALL
>> .Ltmp131:
>> .Lfunc_end4:
>> .size
>> _Z6xfuncxRKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE,
>>
>> .Lfunc_end4-_Z6xfuncxRKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoERNS_9BitVectorE
>>
>>
>> .cfi_endproc
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list