[llvm-dev] Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email?

[Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev]

Would it make sense to officially have phabricator ignore all replies to 
the email thread, and instead require that all comments are done through 
phabricator itself?

-Krzysztof



On 5/25/2016 10:20 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote:
> Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring
> replies. This one seems to be a different issue.
>
> In the thread "[PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in
> assembly directives", Phabricator seems to have completely ignored all
> of the replies starting with my (emailed) reply earlier today: "The .s
> does have a way to carry the location.".
>
> Except for the latest "test" email, where I moved the phab address from
> the "Cc" line to the "To" line. It seems to have gotten that. So maybe
> it ignores emails unless it sees itself in "To:"???
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org
> <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 19 May 2016 at 19:59, James Y Knight via llvm-dev
>     <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>     > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually
>     > they make it through, but sometimes not.
>
>     Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do:
>
>     https://secure.phabricator.com/T7358
>
>     https://secure.phabricator.com/T5181
>
>     cheers,
>     --renato
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>


-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
hosted by The Linux Foundation