[llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct

[Jon Roelofs via llvm-dev]

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Jon Roelofs <jroelofs at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Are there concrete changes that would help clarify this in your mind?
>>
>
> Sorry, I didn't have anything specific in mind. Wordsmithing is not my
> forté.
>
> Lang's modus tollens "proof" in the other part of the thread really helped
> clarify this for me, so I think that along with the change you mention is
> probably enough.
>

And to clarify a bit more, I'm not suggesting that said proof be added to
the doc, rather stating that it helped my understanding :)


Jon


>
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Jon
>
>
>> -Chandler
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160506/da4caf8d/attachment.html>