[llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct

[Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev]

Am 05.05.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev:
> there seems to be pretty widespread support for the general
> direction, and most of the comments on the current wording are important
> but relatively narrow in scope.

You're counting votes here, not building a consensus.
I do not think that that's a good idea, though obviously you disagree.