[llvm-dev] Conditional tablegen expressions with math ops?

[Matthias Braun via llvm-dev]

You can probably go as far as addPreEmitPass(). Just look around CodeGen/Passes.cpp to see where your pass will end up in relation to other passes.

- Matthias

> On May 5, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Phil Tomson <phil.a.tomson at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com <mailto:mbraun at apple.com>> wrote:
> As there are no physical registers allocated at instruction selection time. This sounds something you should rather do in a custom target pass running after register allocation.
> 
> Would such a  pass be added in addMachineLateOptimization()?
> 
>  
> Or you could indeed fix it up at ASMPrinter time (though a custom pass would be more typical I think).
> 
> - Matthias
> 
> > On May 3, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Phil Tomson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> >
> > In our generated asm code we've got a constraint such that two registers in a ternary op have to be in different "banks", best illustrated with an example:
> >
> >    add  r1,r2,r1 # r1 <- r2 + r1
> >
> > The problem here is that the first operand (the receiver of the value) is in the same "bank" as the 3rd operand (r1 again). This will cause an extra cycle to be burned. As it turns out the first and second operands can be in the same bank, so the issue is with the first and third operand being in the same bank.
> >
> > This example is easily "fixed" (the performance is optimized) by swapping the 2nd and 3rd operands:
> >
> >   add  r1, r1, r2 # r1 <- r1 + r2
> >
> >
> > There are four banks and the formula to figure out which bank a register is in is just: r%4
> >
> > Which brings me to tablegen:
> >
> > We've got this in our specialized ArchInstrInfo.td:
> >
> > // r1 = r2 op r3
> > //
> > class ArithOp_RR< bits<7> op,
> >                   string instr_asm,
> >                   SDNode opNode,
> >                   OperandInfo info,
> >                   InstrItinClass itin >
> >   : FR3< op,
> >         (outs info.regClass:$r1),
> >         (ins info.regClass:$r2, info.regClass:$r3),
> >         instr_asm # "\t\t$r1, $r2, $r3, " # info.sizeStr,
> >         [(set info.regClass:$r1, (opNode info.regClass:$r2, info.regClass:$r3))],
> >         itin > {
> >           let isFloat = info.isFloat;
> >           let opsize = info.sizeCode;
> >         }
> >
> > Is there a way to do something like:
> >
> >
> > // r1 = r2 op r3
> > //
> > class ArithOp_RR< bits<7> op,
> >                   string instr_asm,
> >                   SDNode opNode,
> >                   OperandInfo info,
> >                   InstrItinClass itin >
> >   : FR3< op,
> >         (outs info.regClass:$r1),
> >         (ins info.regClass:$r2, info.regClass:$r3),
> > if( $r1%4 == $r3%4 ) {
> >        instr_asm # "\t\t$r1, $r3, $r2, " # info.sizeStr,
> >         [(set info.regClass:$r1, (opNode info.regClass:$r3, info.regClass:$r2))],
> > } else {
> >        instr_asm # "\t\t$r1, $r2, $r3, " # info.sizeStr,
> >         [(set info.regClass:$r1, (opNode info.regClass:$r2, info.regClass:$r3))],
> > }
> >         itin > {
> >           let isFloat = info.isFloat;
> >           let opsize = info.sizeCode;
> >         }
> >
> >
> > Is that even remotely possible? If not, are there other ways to achieve this sort of thing? Would I be better off doing it in the ArchASMPrinter.cpp (I would think this could be problematic)? Or is there somewhere "further up" which would be more appropriate?
> >
> > Phil
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160505/b7b048d2/attachment.html>