[llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct

[Neil Henning via llvm-dev]

Personally I want a document that I can point people to and say 'this is 
what we expect of you if you interact with our community'.

Really simple case where this would have been useful was when a certain 
member of the Linus community used profanity on the list - which may be 
fine in their mailing lists but is certainly not in ours.

Cheers,
-Neil.

On 05/05/16 09:58, C Bergström via llvm-dev wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> Greetings all,
>>
>> This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to
>> establish an LLVM code of conduct.
> Sincerely and pragmatically - what do you think will be different
> after this is in place.. Bureaucracy is great, but what's broken or
> pandemic that you're trying to fix?
>
>  From my side I can be a sarcastic smartass from time to time, but
> overall I don't see that being a heavy burden.. (maybe I'm mistaken?)
> Other than myself - very rarely you get some disagreements on the ML,
> but has it ever been serious? Are these disagreements involving any
> typical suspects? The job postings can be a bit OT, but don't seem to
> soo frequent..
>
> If one very good engineer is unintentionally/inadvertently causing
> friction - how would you deal with that at a policy level which is
> different from what happens today?
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev