[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3

[Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev]

> On May 3, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Smith, Kevin B <kevin.b.smith at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>] On Behalf Of Chris
>> Bieneman via cfe-dev
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 9:07 AM
>> To: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>; Clang Dev <cfe-
>> dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:dev at lists.llvm.org>>
>> Cc: Chris Matthews <cmatthews5 at apple.com <mailto:cmatthews5 at apple.com>>; Galina Kistanova
>> <gkistanova at gmail.com <mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com>>
>> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to
>> 3.4.3
>> 
>> Since there seems to be no strong objections remaining I’d like to propose
>> the following timeline and process:
>> 
>> 4/23 - I will send another follow-up email reminding everyone of this change
>> and timeline
>> 4/30 - I will send a final notice an hour before making the change to the
>> LLVM, Clang, Compiler-RT, Clang-Tools-Extra, LibCXX, LibCXXABI and Test-
>> Suite repos
>> 
>> During the week of 4/30 I will revert as necessary if bots fail. Hopefully
>> having the change permanently landed by the middle of the week.
> 
> Do you mean 5/23 and 5/30?

Yep… Apparently my brain decided it wasn’t ready for April to end yet.

-Chris

> 
>> 
>> Does this sound agreeable to everyone?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Chris
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 4:23 PM, Rowan, Jim via llvm-dev <llvm-
>> dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Late to the party, but we’re ok with upgrading to any suitably stable
>> version.   I don’t have enough background to know which ones are “suitably
>> stable”.. we have bots that run on windows, some old versions of SuSe, and
>> Ubuntu (both x86), and native hexagon bots will come to life at some point.
>> Sounds to me like 3.4.3 is the right choice.
>>> 
>>> It would be nice to have at least a month of lead time. (Which the OP did
>> provide..)   Upgrading every year or so isn’t a hardship.
>>> 
>>> Jim Rowan
>>> jmr at codeaurora.org
>>> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
>> hosted by the Linux Foundation
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160503/b15604d0/attachment.html>