[llvm-dev] [RFC] Helping release management

[Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev]

> On May 2, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:57:45PM -0700, Quentin Colombet wrote:
>> 
>>> On May 2, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:39:12PM -0700, Quentin Colombet wrote:
>>>> Hi Joerg,
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 2, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:27PM -0700, Quentin Colombet via llvm-dev wrote:
>>>>>> 1. Use [Fix] for commit related to bug fixes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not really such a big fan of this format, adds too much noise.
>>>> 
>>>> What alternatives do you have in mind? 
>>> 
>>> If the goal is to help with release management, handle it similar to
>>> phabricator etc, i.e. "MT3.8: yes" or so as data.
>> 
>> This is a post commit thing, right?
>> 
>> I do not think people actively set properties (in the SVN sense) on their commits or are you referring to something else? 
> 
> Just include it in the commit message. That's easy to process with tools
> already.

Oh ok, then you are suggesting a tagging mechanism like I was :).

> 
> Joerg
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160502/e14231fe/attachment.html>