[llvm-dev] Need help with code generation

James Molloy via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 21 12:33:08 PDT 2016


But you're surely not suggesting that lld will segfault as an error
handling mode in production?

You say this was decided in a thread recently- could you please point me at
that? I find this really hard to believe.

Cheers,

James
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 19:28, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:25 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> > Also, if it can segfault for some pathetic input
>>
>> Surely that's a bug though, not seriously designed behaviour?
>>
>
> No. That is a design choice.
>
>
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 19:24 Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We do not enable exceptions and longjmp is not safe. Also, if it can
>>> segfault for some pathetic input, "it longjmps in most cases" doesn't help
>>> people who wants 100% guarantee like you.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:21 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If it can exit, why can't it longjmp back to a library consumer at
>>>> least?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 19:20 Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:16 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> > Correct
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Out of interest, how does LLD itself handle error reporting when
>>>>>> invoked from the command line, and how does it avoid segfaulting in that
>>>>>> case?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It generally reports an error and exit, or in rare circumstances it
>>>>> just segfaults.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 19:14 Rafael EspĂ­ndola <
>>>>>> rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21 March 2016 at 15:10, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Well sure, it's unlikely, but how many consumers can make that
>>>>>>> sort of
>>>>>>> > guarantee? And if a consumer can't guarantee the integrity of the
>>>>>>> ELF file
>>>>>>> > they have no choice but not to use LLD, or to fork before using it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Rafael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160321/8b444c84/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list