[llvm-dev] Any objections to re-sorting #include lines with clang-format/clang-tidy?

[Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev]

The crazy clang-format folks have taught it to sort includes, and
clang-tidy has a nice way to run it across all of LLVM and Clang.

Before I just submit the fixes (and any bug reports to the clang-format
folks if it sorts things weirdly) I wanted to double check that folks would
be ok with this. My understanding is that the sorting should match the LLVM
conventions, but if not, I'll make sure to get that fixed first.

-Chandler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160311/283043bd/attachment.html>