[llvm-dev] Regression in SPEC2006/gcc caused by LoopLoadElimination

Eric Christopher via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 10 09:20:35 PST 2016


Or Ben will test. :)

Thanks Adam!

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016, 9:07 AM Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
> > I’ve committed the fix in r263058.  Haicheng, Eric/Benjamin, can you guys
> > please give it a test with your codebase.  (You need to enable the pass
> with
> > -mllvm -enable-loop-load-elim.)
>
> The miscompilation I was seeing is gone now, too. Thanks!
>
> > On Mar 7, 2016, at 11:05 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 7, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Haicheng,
> >
> > Sorry about the breakage.  I reverted it in r262839.
> >
> > I will try to reproduce it locally.  Please don’t blow away your
> directories
> > yet in case I need further help.
> >
> >
> > OK, I managed to reproduce this locally.  Should be able to make progress
> > from here without further help from you.
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adam
> >
> > On Mar 7, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Haicheng Wu <haicheng at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > I find LoopLoadElimination (r262250) causes SPEC2006/gcc generate wrong
> > result (166.s) in AArch64 when running with *ref* data set.  The error
> > happens when I use either “-Ofast -flto -fuse-ld=gold” or “-O3
> > -fno-strict-aliasing”.  Please let me know if you need more information.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Haicheng
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160310/0d0783a5/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list