[llvm-dev] The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.

[Brian Cain via llvm-dev]

Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7.  I wanted to build it
against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer
libstdc++.

Sorry, it would be clearer if I'd have made the package name include
"centos6.7".

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> wrote:

> [root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin
> [root at localhost bin]# ./clang
> ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
> ./clang)
> ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
> ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found
> (required by ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found
> (required by ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found
> (required by ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found
> (required by ./clang)
>
>
> --
>          此致
> 礼
> 罗勇刚
> Yours
>     sincerely,
> Yonggang Luo
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>


-- 
-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160628/fa786b45/attachment.html>