[llvm-dev] [Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject

[Jason Henline via llvm-dev]

Would it be parallel-libs/libomptarget/
or
parallel-libs/omp/libomptarget/

To me the second way seems better because it seems likely that other OpenMP
stuff could end up in there in the long run.

Once we decide on which code to share, I think we will end up with new
directories at the top level for those common components.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev
> <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Thanks for your help, Tanya!
> >
> > I haven't created the project in SVN yet. Am I able to set it up myself
> on
> > the LLVM servers, or does someone else need to do that part?
> >
> > I'll be glad to volunteer to moderate the new mailing lists.
> >
> > We will want a website. I think there will be a top-level docs directory
> for
> > the project and a docs directory for each subproject. To begin with,
> > StreamExecutor will be the only subproject so the structure will look
> > something like this:
> >
> > parallel-libs/
> >   docs/
> >   stream_executor/
> >     docs/
> >
> > Does that seem like a reasonable way to set it up?
>
> What will it look like when they add the liboffload from OMP?
>
> Would it be parallel-libs/libomptarget/
> or
> parallel-libs/omp/libomptarget/
>
> If there's any code in SE which is "common" and can or should be
> reused to consumed - maybe give some long term consideration to
> superficial refactoring. This "lib/API" design mentality is common in
> llvm/clang and it would be nice if it was mirrored here.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160616/8d2e0c84/attachment.html>