[llvm-dev] llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question

Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 7 13:45:46 PDT 2016


Tim,

 Are you referring to setLibcallName? That is target specific yes but there
isn't RTLIB for most of the libm functions, for example, for acos this
doesn't apply.

 Ideally what I would like is to create a libc with functions like acos
called something like __xxx_acos that can still be recognized to be
optimized.

 RTLIB is pretty limited but it works fine, I can just use
setLibcallName(RTLIB::floor, "__xxx_floor")... but again, the functions
that are RTLIB are limited. Using intrinsics make it more difficult because
then you have to match the intrinsic (rather than it automatically
generating a lib call). ISD is just as bad (FCOPYSIGN, FABS for example)
because then they need to be manually lowered.

Thanks,

Ryan



On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 7 June 2016 at 13:24, Ryan Taylor via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Not sure why it's called TargetLibraryInfo if it's not in target specific
> > code? It seems that ALL targets use this code, making it generic. Am I
> > missing something here?
>
> Some of the names can vary by platform, for example ARM sometimes has
> __aeabi_memcpy instead of memcpy
>
> > ps. The spec also states (albeit unclearly) that you can use "#undef" to
> > omit a library function so that a user defined function of the same name
> can
> > be used but LLVM doesn't seem to support that.
>
> I think it says exactly the opposite: (7.1.2p3):
>
>     "If the program removes (with #undef) any macro definition of an
> identifier in the first group listed above, the behavior is
> undefined."
>
> Incidentally, I don't think anyone's mentioned that "-ffreestanding"
> will probably inhibit the intrinsics substantially if that's what
> you're after (technically, it's probably a compiler extension that it
> gives them back to the user, but everyone does it as far as I know).
>
> Cheers.
>
> Tim.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160607/a049c3ff/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list