[llvm-dev] Target Acceptance Policy

[Renato Golin via llvm-dev]

On 29 July 2016 at 18:01, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote:
> I don't know what the right number should be, to be honest. 2-3 sounds
> better than 6, though, given the rate of change of the LLVM codebase.

Good, that's the current version:

 5. The target must have been stable in the tree and have addressed
every other minimum requirement for at least 2-3 months. This cool down
period is to make sure that the back-end and the target community can
endure continuous upstream development for the foreseeable future.

cheers,
--renato