[llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories?

[James Molloy via llvm-dev]

Hi,

That's why we collate responses and provide summaries and proposals, which
is what Renato did. There are a lot of technical deep dives on this thread
that make it difficult to keep track of where consensus is going.

Besides which we surely care about all our users and developers, and not
just the loud ones or ones with enough cajones to chip in on a massive
thread full of big names without fear of embarrassing themselves. We also
surely don't want a slew of '+1 to the proposal 93 replies ago'; how does
that help anyone decide if consensus is reached?

How can you decide that people who don't see this thread don't get the
chance to vote? It's summer time and people *will* be on vacation. Do you
expect them to find this in their inbox when they come back and read
through every response? This is not realistic.

James
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 19:23, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> On 7/27/2016 1:04 PM, James Molloy via llvm-dev wrote:
> > This thread is not particularly inviting. It has over 300 replies at the
> > time of writing and we don't all have the time to delve into such a
> > quagmire. That doesn't mean our opinions are worthless.
>
> It doesn't take reading all responses to see where the discussion is
> going. Important decisions take time to make. People took a lot of
> effort in this thread to present their ideas and to address various
> concerns. I bet they all have other things to do as well.
>
> -Krzysztof
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160727/14fc2fcf/attachment.html>