[llvm-dev] [RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental
Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 19 09:04:55 PDT 2016
Oops - meant to send this to the full list.
MartinO
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin J. O'Riordan [mailto:martin.oriordan at movidius.com]
Sent: 19 July 2016 15:56
To: 'Krzysztof Parzyszek' <kparzysz at codeaurora.org>
Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental
I know this is a bit of a dumb question, but every so often I read about one back-end or another being made "experimental", or promoted to "non-experimental".
Presumably if my out-of-tree backend was to be pushed to LLVM, it too would be considered experimental. But what is involved in making a particular target, feature or back-end experimental other than simply agreement? Are there particular build processes or '-Dmacroname's to add, or how does somebody like me edit my out-of-tree sources so that it would obey the "is experimental" rules?
Thanks,
MartinO
-----Original Message-----
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev
Sent: 19 July 2016 15:17
To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental
On 7/19/2016 6:12 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> I don't see why not. LGTM.
Same here.
-Krzysztof
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation _______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list