[llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements

[James Y Knight via llvm-dev]

I had actually just meant in my comments to update the library we have, not
switch to a brand new one.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> And I also want to ask again about possible change of regexp library.
> There are a lot of comments that some changes in FileCheck are useless,
> because they may be replaced by using some features of regular expressions,
> but they are not supported by current library.
>
> I don't know a lot about modern C++ regexp library, but there are:
> 1. PCRE(pcre.h)
> 2. std::regex. It has no necessary features. So it can't be taken.
> 3. There is regex library in boost.
> 4. Also there is regex library in poco.
>
> Are there any other variants?
>
> Thanks,
> Elena.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
> Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:37 PM
> To: Dean Michael Berris <dean.berris at gmail.com>; Mehdi Amini <
> mehdi.amini at apple.com>
> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
>
> Hi all,
>
> I made new patches for most of changes with llvm-commits subscriber. But
> two patches were updated, because there are a lot of comments (patch for
> CHECK-WORD and patch for templates pattern). Will it be ok?
>
> Thanks, Elena.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Dean
> Michael Berris via llvm-dev
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 6:53 AM
> To: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>
> Cc: via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements
>
>
> > On 19 Jul 2016, at 04:18, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > We had a long thread about that a few weeks (months?) ago: the
> conclusion (as I remember) was roughly a guideline to “always start a new
> revision to have a proper mailing-list thread starting with context (i.e.
> patch description)”
> > (and my dissident minority opinion that it is only worth it if there
> hasn’t been significant round of reviews going on on the existing revision)
> >
>
> Pardon me for missing that discussion, this may have already been asked
> before: but is it possible to make arcanist default subscribe the correct
> commits mailing list in the process? This should make it at least harder to
> forget.
>
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160719/8bb1df5c/attachment.html>