[llvm-dev] llvm 3.8.1 Release

Emil Medve via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 8 10:43:39 PDT 2016


Hello Tom,


Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org> writes:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working on uploading all the packages now.

I've downloaded them files several times from different locations (suspected
my webgw might muck with the content) using different clients and the result
is the same:

$ gpg --verify ~/Downloads/cfe-3.8.1.src.tar.xz.sig
distfiles/cfe-3.8.1.src.tar.xz
gpg: Signature made Mon 04 Jul 2016 10:43:59 PM CDT using RSA key ID
8F0871F202119294
gpg: Good signature from "Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 11E5 21D6 4698 2372 EB57  7A1F 8F08 71F2 0211 9294
$ xz -t distfiles/cfe-3.8.1.src.tar.xz

$ gpg --verify ~/Downloads/lldb-3.8.1.src.tar.xz.sig
distfiles/lldb-3.8.1.src.tar.xz
gpg: Signature made Mon 04 Jul 2016 10:46:27 PM CDT using RSA key ID
8F0871F202119294
gpg: BAD signature from "Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>" [unknown]
$ xz -t distfiles/lldb-3.8.1.src.tar.xz
xz: distfiles/lldb-3.8.1.src.tar.xz: Unexpected end of input

$ gpg --verify ~/Downloads/llvm-3.8.1.src.tar.xz.sig
distfiles/llvm-3.8.1.src.tar.xz
gpg: Signature made Mon 04 Jul 2016 10:46:32 PM CDT using RSA key ID
8F0871F202119294
gpg: BAD signature from "Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>" [unknown]
$ xz -t distfiles/llvm-3.8.1.src.tar.xz
xz: distfiles/llvm-3.8.1.src.tar.xz: Unexpected end of input

For the "bad" files, sizes are much smaller then their v3.8.0 counterparts:

$ du -sh llvm-3.8.*
16M	llvm-3.8.0.src.tar.xz
224K	llvm-3.8.1.src.tar.xz
$ du -sh lldb-3.8.*
11M	lldb-3.8.0.src.tar.xz
12K	lldb-3.8.1.src.tar.xz

Perhaps the files didn't finish uploading?


Cheers,


> -Tom
> 
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 03:49:39PM +0000, Del Myers via llvm-dev wrote:
> > We just wanted to check to see if they are real bugs first. We will
report them if they are not already fixed. Thanks.
> > 
> > Del
> > 
> > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin <at> linaro.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 6, 2016 12:07 AM
> > To: Del Myers <delmyers <at> microsoft.com>
> > Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org>
> > Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] llvm 3.8.1 Release
> > 
> > 
> > Did you report the bugs? It would be a lot easier to know if those were
in bugzilla, and tracked against 3.8.0.
> > 
> > If not, there's still time to report them before 3.9.0 branches out.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Renato
> > On 6 Jul 2016 12:21 a.m., "Del Myers" <delmyers <at>
microsoft.com<mailto:delmyers <at> microsoft.com>> wrote:
> > We were using 3.8.0, and found several bugs. We wanted to see if 3.8.1
fixes them.
> > 
> > Del
> > 
> > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin <at>
linaro.org<mailto:renato.golin <at> linaro.org>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:19 PM
> > 
> > To: Del Myers <delmyers <at> microsoft.com<mailto:delmyers <at>
microsoft.com>>
> > Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev <at>
lists.llvm.org>>
> > Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] llvm 3.8.1 Release
> > 
> > 
> > Not yet, publicly at least. Are you waiting for something specific in
3.8.1? If not, there isn't much
> difference from 3.8.0, using that should be fine.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Renato
> > On 6 Jul 2016 12:14 a.m., "Del Myers" <delmyers <at>
microsoft.com<mailto:delmyers <at> microsoft.com>> wrote:
> > OK, so, if I understand, the tag is at 3.8.1, but there is no source
drop available for download?
> > 
> > Del
> > 
> > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin <at>
linaro.org<mailto:renato.golin <at> linaro.org>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 4:12 PM
> > To: Del Myers <delmyers <at> microsoft.com<mailto:delmyers <at>
microsoft.com>>
> > Cc: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev <at>
lists.llvm.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] llvm 3.8.1 Release
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Del,
> > 
> > Yes, the tag is for the latest stable release. It's a bit confusing, we
may have to change that later.
> > 
> > Regarding the release, it was tested a while ago, but Tom is a bit late,
that's all.
> > 
> > I think due to a matter of contingency, we may need to appoint a
secondary release manager to handle such
> delays. After all, people do have the right to have personal issues once
in a while. 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Renato
> > On 5 Jul 2016 11:51 p.m., "Del Myers via llvm-dev"
> <llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > First off, I’m new to this mailing list so please forgive me if I’m
posting to the wrong one. I have a
> quick question about the llvm 3.8.1 release.
>
http://llvm.org/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fllvm.org%2f&data=01%7c01%7cdelmyers%40microsoft.com%7cb68abedb6f5c45ad877c08d3a529cbc9%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ES2jcG4j%2fPorceJbjS3%2bB3ERaGxA9wb81fR9Fwa2OHA%3d>
> indicates that 3.8.1 was released on June 15, but there is no download
link for it? Also, when you sync to the
> 3.8.0 tag, in svn or the git mirror, it seems that there are commits
passed the 3.8.0 release. Does that mean
> that the tag is actually for 3.8.1? I’m a little confused. Thanks.
> > 
> > Del
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org>
> >
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flists.llvm.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fllvm-dev&data=01%7c01%7cdelmyers%40microsoft.com%7cb68abedb6f5c45ad877c08d3a529cbc9%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=L1wjtIGTbL%2bbVn2nfyoGGObgS%2b7%2bOi0HM95rXB8Ip1E%3d>
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev <at> lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> 




More information about the llvm-dev mailing list