[llvm-dev] Should DISubprogram's scope be allowed to be null?

[Diego Novillo via llvm-dev]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> In the patch comments I suggested adding a separate named metadata node to
> root compile units that you want in the IR, but not emitted into the
> binary. I assume that would work for you?
>

Absolutely.  It's, in fact, preferable.  The current approach is fairly
hacky.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160118/1d5e0e73/attachment.html>