[llvm-dev] Should DISubprogram's scope be allowed to be null?

[Diego Novillo via llvm-dev]

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:24 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:


> Diego: To include line/col info for backend diagnostics, we produced debug
> info but omitted the llvm.dbg.cu entry, right? So there are subprogram
> debug info descriptions that are not referenced from a CU in llvm.dbg.cu,
> yes?
>

Yes, that and for sample PGO.  Omitting llvm.dbg.cu prevents codegen from
emitting all that debug info to the final binary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160118/bdd50eb7/attachment.html>