[llvm-dev] [RFC] Error handling in LLVM libraries.

[Lang Hames via llvm-dev]

Ahh - that makes sense. Thanks. :)

- Lang.

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> >> The main differences are
> >> * This will hopefully be used.
> >> * TypedErrorOr is really a TypedError or T. The situation before was not
> >> that ErrorOr was std::error_code or T.
> >
> > I don't follow that second point. As I see it, TypedErrorOr<T> and
> > ErrorOr<T> are identical except for two points: TypedError replaces
> > std::error_code, and as a consequence TypedErrorOr is only movable, not
> > copyable.
>
>
> That is the case now. Sorry, Mchiael and I were talking about ancient
> history when ErrorOr<T> was *not* an std::error_code or T.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160223/b97cbf34/attachment.html>