[llvm-dev] Proposal: virtual constant propagation

[Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev]

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:43:37AM -0800, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> > > (It also includes the insight that you don't need to store
> > > an inheritance graph or anything like that, just the valid address points
> > > for each vtable).
> > 
> > I’m not sure what you mean in this sentence.
> 
> Sorry about that. Hopefully all will become clear once I update the docs.

Hi Mehdi,

I have updated docs/BitSets.rst to hopefully give a clearer explanation of
how bitsets can encode C++ type information. Please take a look and let me
know if this makes more sense to you.

It looks like the HTML documentation at llvm.org isn't updating, so you can
read the document at [1] or just look in the source tree.

Thanks,
-- 
Peter

[1] http://llvm.org/klaus/llvm/blob/master/docs/BitSets.rst