[llvm-dev] Enabling statistics in release builds / static constructors

[Matthias Braun via llvm-dev]

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:23 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 13, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Given that LLVM has so many auto-registration systems (cl::opt, target registry, pass registry, statistics, I'm sure there's more), maybe we should spend the time to build an auto-registration system that doesn't involve static constructors?
>> I would volunteer to do the work, however this obviously needs some consensus first on how that would look.
>> 
>>> 
>>> It needs custom code for every supported object file format, and is hard to get right when DSOs are involved, but in the long run it's probably worth fixing this problem once and for all.
>> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms.
>> 
>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code!
> 
> I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.). The idea would be to have explicit registration (from the pass ctor for instance) and the storage for the options being hold in the context somehow (old memories, not sure about the details).
> 
> CC Chris who likely has more information (and possibly pointers).

You probably mean:
http://web.archive.org/http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-August/075886.html <http://web.archive.org/http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-August/075886.html> [1]
and
http://reviews.llvm.org/D5389 <http://reviews.llvm.org/D5389>

but I fail to see how that helps Statistic variables which are still global.

- Matthias

[1] Please someone please give us an easier time to access old mails when you just have the old link...


>  
> Mehdi
> 
> 
> 
>> So here comes the strawman:
>> 
>> 
>> static Statistic NumBlips("blips");
>> static cl::opt MyOpt("my-cool-option", cl::desc("bla"));
>> static cl::opt AnotherOpt("bla", cl::desc("foo bar"));
>> // Note that the constructors of Statistic and cl::opt would be reworked to be pure constexpr and do not run any code
>> 
>> static void init_globals() {
>> NumBlips.init();
>> MyOpt.init();
>> AnotherOpt.init();
>> }
>> // Note that the init_globals() function is pretty mechanical so hopefully easy to understand and maintain.
>> 
>> We have to call init_gloabals somewhere early:
>> - Put an init_globals() call into code that runs early.
>> - We already have a lot of early running functions called initializeXXXPass() which we can use for this
>> - For the remaining files we probably have to export init_globals() and call it from some common place of the library.
>> 
>> If someone comes up a with working solution for putting initializers into a section we can later replace the
>> init_globals() function with that so the refactoring work to split into constexpr constructor and init() is not wasted either way!
>> 
>> - Matthias
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161213/63cc8c5b/attachment.html>